13 posts tagged “racism”
Posted: 02 Jul 2009 04:54 AM PDT (Via BoingBoing)
Chris sez,
In France, there's no provision for monitoring ethnicity under the law. This is not an altogether bad thing, but it makes it impossible for anyone to get data about police 'ethnic profiling' [what us Brits call 'racial discrimination'] in the way that they treat members of visible minorities.
With no official data to go on, and no official co-operation, French researchers surreptitiously staked out areas of heavy police presence, and then noted the ethnicity of people stopped, before approaching them and conducting their own follow-up interviews. Their methodology needed to be pretty robust to make sure that this rather innovative way of collecting data did not bias the sample.
The results are pretty conclusive: even allowing for the nature of the population in the public space, if you are of Black appearance, you are more than six times more likely to be stopped than in you look White. People who look like Arabs are more than seven times more likely than Whites to be stopped.
What's to be done? The report makes a number of practical suggestions.
Profiling Minorities: A Study of Stop-and-Search Practices in Paris (PDF) (Thanks, Chris!)

SHAME ON THEM !
(via Neatorama)
Posted: 27 Mar 2009 11:49 AM PDT
Photo: Charlotte Button
After Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated in 1968, school teacher Jane Elliott wanted to teach her third-grade class about racism. Rather than a lengthy discussion about it, she decided to show the 8-year-olds what racism is all about in a famous "experiment":
With King shot just the day before in Memphis, Elliott encouraged her third-graders to discuss how something so horrible could happen.
"I finally said, ‘Do you kids have any idea how it feels to be something other than white in this country?’ "
The children shook their heads and said they wanted to learn, so Elliott set the rules. Blue-eyed children must use a cup to drink from the fountain. Blue-eyed children must leave late to lunch and to recess. Blue-eyed children were not to speak to brown-eyed children. Blue-eyed children were troublemakers and slow learners.
Within 15 minutes, Elliott says, she observed her brown-eyed students morph into youthful supremacists and blue-eyed children become uncertain and intimidated.
Brown-eyed children "became domineering and arrogant and judgmental and cool," she says. "And smart! Smart! All of a sudden, disabled readers were reading. I thought, ‘This is not possible, this is my imagination.’ And I watched bright, blue-eyed kids become stupid and frightened and frustrated and angry and resentful and distrustful. It was absolutely the strangest thing I’d ever experienced."
Corina Knoll of the Los Angeles Times has the story: Link
posted by By Anna Roitman • February 1, 2009 (via the commentfactory )

I would like you to read this article by Anna Roitman, a friend of mine.
“The desire to see the world as we wish it to be rather than the way it truly is, if not dealt with, will inevitably lead to discontent, unhappiness and confusion.” (The Tao Teh Ching)
Israel has always been always perceived as a miracle in the eyes of the other nations. Friends and foes together looked upon the rising nation, which spent 2000 years on an exile, with caution, admiration and amazement, as Jews from all over the world gathered on this small piece of land and managed to build a western society in the Middle East, which exists among many fundamentalist societies.
The embodiment of the Zionist dream is beautiful – a nation that was rootless, battered and beaten throughout history, and blamed for all the world’s maladies has found its base and has a homeland, rising from the ashes of the holocaust and attempting to build a society which will be the refuge for all Jewish people who will ever need it. The idea was excellent but the path to Hell is paved with good intentions.
Jews from all over the world gathered in our small country due to the waves of immigration, or shall I say repatriation, which is the correct wording for such immigration in Israel. There is no other country in the whole wide world which grants citizenship so easily to a person who was not born within its borders. There is no other nation in the world which takes the same law, in the name of which millions of its own were killed, and uses it to determine the criteria for citizenship within its borders. This criteria has brought into Israel over the last 20 years two major waves of immigration. One from the former countries of the Soviet Union and the other from Ethiopia.
In spite of a beautiful wrap of Zionist values and an immediate package of citizen rights, which the Jewish agency sells to its prospect costumers all over the world, nothing prepares the future Israeli for the first encounter with the society they are about to enter. In fact, there is no warning about the fact that repatriation, although sounding idealistic and honorable, is immigration for better and for worse. Those who repatriate to Israel experience the same exact hardships – socially, mentally and physically — as any immigrant in any other country with one major difference. If all Israelis are brothers and sisters, it is much more painful to have your own family stabbing you in the back from time after time than a stranger.
Both Ethiopean and Russian-speaking immigrants brought to Israel skilled workers, academics and youth who will be useful in the future as soldiers and leaders who will have to decide as to the future of our country. When we promised their parents they could come Israel and be among brothers, we committed to make them feel like the sons who returned home from an exile, but this never happened. What we provided instead was an immigration process that none of them was really prepared to deal with.
The Israeli notion that our culture is the best and everybody else just has to fit in meant forcing the immigrants to abandon what they were used to so they could be assimilated. As with all immigrations, the new is always treated with suspicion and will not be fully accepted until it proves itself. We let the parents of this new youth bang their heads against the glass ceiling, we let them struggle because “that is how it was for the first settlers who came here …”; they live in the periphery of the country, in the worse neighborhoods and in terrible conditions. We don’t bother helping this youth get educated and we expect them to serve the army under the motto “the country gave you so much and you must give some back to the country”.
Let us all face it – we are a bunch of hypocrites. The so called repatriation to Israel is immigration like all immigrations. People suffer and are scarred for life by their own people. I choose to us ‘we’ as a pronoun, including myself in the group because I see myself as Israeli after all, but I feel, at the same time, I should shed some light on the situation, to bring the change, both for people who plan to repatriate to be prepared and for us to be more acceptant.
Some weeks ago I have listened to a fellow of mine telling about a project she participates in. The idea of it was to take teenagers who repatriated from the former Soviet Union and keep them in a special club with activities, preventing them from being on the streets at the same time and being involved in criminal activity. The rationale behind it was also to get them closer to Hebrew speaking adults in order to reduce the antagonism created through years of them growing up and being looked upon as the “other”.
As she spoke of the project I felt happy that something is being done until she told about what she is really doing there. She said she was working with them on their “Jewish identity”; that is, she was taking for granted that what they need is more ideology rather than mental help. As she spoke her eyes were glowing with joy and as she described her mission she had a pious sound in her voice. It reminded me of stories about nuns, who went to help the orphans in Africa. Did they really go to help the orphans or did they go there to promote Christianity? Even the immigrant youth is seen as a vessel to pour ideology into. These children need help to deal with the stress of our demanding society and sometimes also with food in their stomach, maybe then will they see this country is a country worth fighting for.
Anna moved to Israel from the Soviet Union at the age of 5.
Thanks, Anna :-)

it started in Lucca this week, when the town council banned any new ethnic food outlets from opening within the walls of the medieval city. And it quickly spread to Milan: a ban on ethnic foods, meaning foods that are not Italian. The Northern League party wants to protect regional specialties from the encroaching popularity of ethnic cuisines, like egg rolls and kebabs.
The Italian Minister of Agriculture, Luca Zaia, applauded the restrictions, saying ethnic restaurants should "stop importing container loads of meat and fish from who knows where" and use only Italian ingredients. Asked if he had ever tried a kebab, Mr. Zaia said no: "I prefer the dishes of my native Veneto. I even refuse to eat pineapple."
Is it gastronomic racism, or a legitimate attempt to preserve authentic Italian cuisine?
I totaly agree with Cola:
Neither. It’s xenophobia. “Ethnic” food usually means immigrants. Fresh immigrants without citizenship or education have few options, and this dissuades them. Particularly the inability to find ingredients essential to cuisine which makes them feel at home in their own homes.
I mean, I can understand if they want to preserve the “Italian” identity of these cities for purposes of tourism, but it’s absolutely ridiculous, and no intelligent person should believe, that the only options are kebabs or linguine.
Anyway, I find it ironic, since all mediterranean cuisine comes from an ancient history of cultural exchange. - Thanks Cola
PeaceSalam says: The moral of the video clip is nice, keep hope alive!
Richard Hofstadter, 1964:
If, after our historically discontinuous examples of the paranoid style, we now take the long jump to the contemporary right wing, we find some rather important differences from the nineteenth-century movements. The spokesmen of those earlier movements felt that they stood for causes and personal types that were still in possession of their country—that they were fending off threats to a still established way of life. But the modern right wing, as Daniel Bell has put it, feels dispossessed: America has been largely taken away from them and their kind, though they are determined to try to repossess it and to prevent the final destructive act of subversion. The old American virtues have already been eaten away by cosmopolitans and intellectuals; the old competitive capitalism has been gradually undermined by socialistic and communistic schemers; the old national security and independence have been destroyed by treasonous plots, having as their most powerful agents not merely outsiders and foreigners as of old but major statesmen who are at the very centers of American power. Their predecessors had discovered conspiracies; the modern radical right finds conspiracy to be betrayal from on high.
Michelle Malkin, 2008:
Over the weekend, I watched a hilarious, dead-on, and surprisingly honest skit on Saturday Night Live about the craptastic bailout and its Democrat roots. [...]
The video has been pulled. Vanished into thin air. (Go here for full transcript and screenshots.)
Where did it go and why?
I have a theory.
One of the rapacious couples featured in the skit was Herbert and Marion Sandler (portrayed by Darrell Hammond and Casey Wilson). Unlike the other composite figures, the Sandlers are a real-life couple.
Also lampooned: Left-wing billionaire George Soros.
As Todd Thurman at Heritage notes, the Sandlers are left-wing moguls who built “a mortgage company whose major product was subprime mortgages and they sold it to Wachovia for $24.2 billion in 2006. And what do the Sandlers do when they are not peddling subprime garbage? They are busy writing checks to leftist groups like the Center for American Progress, the American Civil Liberties Union, and Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN). Yes that ACORN.”
The post-modern radical right, then, feels dispossessed by a conspiracy of: Democrats; liberals; “RINOs“; the enemedia; TV sketch comedy shows; community organizers; and “left-wing moguls”, “coastal latte-sipping elites”, “city-dwelling liberal bien pessant“, “secular urban intellectuals” and so on, which either is Hieratic Wingnuttese for “sinister Jews”, or has superceded it. Also, Barack Obama is a Commie Musselman, Rachael Ray joined Hamas, Margret Cho’s dog is a terrorist, and the economy is humming right along, thankyouverymuch. Betrayed once from below; then from above; and now an incomprehensible lattice of conspiracies impinging from all directions, and within.
Fortunately, WFB, Jr. expelled all the Birchers into the outer darkness 2 years befor Hofstadter noticed them, and it is now the Democrat Party which suffers the most casualties in this area. Fortunately.